Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark Spark's avatar

.

Hi Tom,

I listened to and studied Peterson and his daughter for years. I found his health issues and those of his wife and daughter to be particularly interesting.

At one point, all three famuly members were very sick and at that time much conventional medicine failed them miserably.

For example...

Mikhaila, Jordan's daughter, experimented with changes in her diet and she found her new diets to be profoundly curative. Night and day.

Evidently the Peterson family, and family friends, helped each other to sound health with love and logic. Their diet is not for everyone, but I think we all need to treat ourselves to healthy doses of such love and logic.

I understood the 12 rules idea, like the 12 steps idea of AA, as something that might be very useful for certain people who might be struggling with autonomy. I never thought it was for me.

Also, when I saw the academic book reports on Exodus and other books of the Christian Bible, I took them the same way I take Wikipedia articles. I study them to become familiar with the names, events, and ideas that are related in close association. I take everything with a grain of salt.

I certainly never saw Jordan as a spiritual leader. I really don't think there is such a thing.

Believe much?

As for me personally, I believe we are surrounded by miracles that we constantly fail to appreciate.

For example, I am an extreme introvert, a happy hermit, now married into an extended family of hundreds, many of whom honor me by calling me "Tío" (uncle). In any given year since 1990, I get at least three times as many hugs as there are days in a year.

Each hug is a miracle, a gift from God, as far as I'm concerned. Good luck trying to convince me otherwise.

Jordan will never be my personal counselor, spiritual or otherwise,, but I believe he has discovered some significant ideas respecting rhetoric, logic, health, metaphysics, and science. Many of his ideas, I beilieve, are worth careful examination.

But...

What do I lnow?

mark spark

[ :-)

.

Expand full comment
Mark Spark's avatar

.

Hi Roger,

When the harmful elements of a presentation outweight the benefits of it, then it's time to look elsewhere for one's learning and wisdom.

I think any debate, as a zero sum activity, producing a loser with every winner, will always be limited in its benefits. Being convincing is not the same as being right.

The dialogue you mention, if I understood you correctly, specifically as a mutual search for truth, call it a "dialectic," might be the best possible approach to discovering the truth. That would be a non-zero sum activity, a win/win, metaphorically speaking, the rising tide that lifts all boats.

Methods may differ, but the intention of discovering the true true, with its inherent goodness and natural beauty, such intention, and such attention, are what matters.

I summarize this rinse-and-repeat process as

Wake up

Wise up

Grow up

Show up...

I think at least 4 paths to truth should be consideted together, that is

Intuition

Imagination

Science (testing experientially)

Reasoning

and that implicate reality (souls, agape, compassion) matters just as explicate reality (measurable, observable stuff) matters.

mark spark

.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts