Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ishan Mishra's avatar

Bechamp or pasteur is an awesome read, I’d recommend checking out “Holographic blood: a new dimension in medicine” by Harvey Bigelsen as well on this topic! Books changed my life completely, I collected so many most interesting finds that owning a Huge library is now a life goal lol

Expand full comment
Mark Spark's avatar

.

Tom.

Tom, Tom, Tom, Tom.

re body as "fundamentally electromagnetic"

(?????) (OMG)

First, let me say that my soulful and brotherly love for you is real.

It is real and meaningful and significant, to me. Though I say rhis subjectively, also, to anyone who trusts me, it can truthfully be considered an objective reality, something that is the case, is true, is existing.

Next, ask these questions with me. What is the cause or source of love? Have we any clue at all, any indication of an origin that can be pointed to or named, be it via the awareness, the thinking, the feeling, or the expression?

Rabbit from a hat?

Note the elements in this simple sentence: "I love you."

Take "I." Does "I" refer to a body? Some collection of grouped protons, atoms, with fields of vibrational or radiative energy?

Do sentences like:

"These protons love those protons."

or

"This energy field loves that energy field."

or

"This frequency of wave pulses loves that frequency of wave pulses."

make any sense whatsoever?

Let's look.

I am not my body. Evidently so. Then what does my body (a collection of grouped protons and energy fields) encounter in order for me to point to my head and

reasonably say that my thoughts are there? Or what does my body encounter when I point to my heart (a collection of grouped protons and energy fields, that happens to serve as a blood flow regulator) and say I have this or that feeling here?

What's "love"? Matter? Energy? I'd say no to matter or energy. What then? Are we talking about a common or shared encounter of relationship? I'd say yes to all three elements: a shared awareness, an encountering (each to the other), and a relationship of two different entities.

In fact I'd say relation comes even before the entities related. That might sound weird to some.

I'd also say that the awareness or consciousness stuff comes before the physical material stuff. I guess that must sound weird to most.

Where did I get such ideas? Mostly from Iain McGilchrist. Blame him. I'm studying, reading and listening to these and related ideas expounded in "The Matter With Things."

If anybody asks why I sit at the handicapped table at the coffee shop I say I read slow.

No worries, OK?

My mom always said if I had half a brain I'd be dangerous. See? No worries.

mark spark

[ :-)

.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts